> > I disagree with Tom on [1]: it should clearly be "srcname", in analogy > to #+tblname - and also so I don't have to change my files :-} (but see > my question about tblname below). > > I agree on [2] "call". >
noted > > I'm confused by [3] so I will say nothing for now, except to ask some > questions: are we talking about what a human would use to label a piece > of data for consumption by a block (including perhaps the future > possibilities of lists and paragraphs that Tom brought up)? Yes, and lists are already supported. Supporting paragraphs would not be difficult. > what babel would use to label a results block (possibly so that it > could be consumed by another block in a chain)? both? yes > would that mean that #+tblname would go the way of the dodo and that > tables would be labelled with #+data (or #+object or whatever else we > come up with)? > I am hesitant to suggest changing #+tblname: as it is used throughout the rest of Org-mode, so it may be that whatever choice is made here tblname will remain a synonymous option. Thanks -- Eric > > Thanks, > Nick > -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/