Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > On 14.10.2011, at 13:31, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
[...] > >> I have nothing against (1) as item bullets, as it doesn't interfere >> with any existing Org syntax. > > That is not the only criterion. Adding new syntax elements make more > ASCII sequences special. The Org markup is a heuristic set of > special elements, and there is merrit in keeping it small. We already > have more bullets and in particular numbered types - and so far > I have not seen a compelling reason to add more. > > - Carsten I am in the "keep it simple school". So long as org allows me to distinguish between numbered and unnumbered itemised lists, I am happy. I actually would prefer less choices than there are currently because I would like to get to my choice more quickly when I do use C-c - to change the type! To me, org is about information and time management, not about formatting. YMMV, of course! To be blunt, I would be happy with "-" and "1." in org, knowing that I can customise upon export if necessary! I'm not suggesting we go this far, however ;-) -- : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.90.1 : using Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.381.g05ea)
