Hi Matt, Matt Lundin <m...@imapmail.org> writes:
>> Ok, it may be convenient in that specific case, but it still looks like >> a hack to me. Another solution would be to implement a function to >> navigate between time-stamps, similar to `org-next-link'. One can even >> generalize this function to move to the next non-structural element >> (time-stamp, link, footnote, latex snippet, emphasized text)[1]. > > That sounds like a good idea. +1 >> Furthermore, being loose isn't always convenient. In the following >> example, where will I go if I use C-c C-o on the space between the two >> links? >> >> [[http://www.google.com][Google]] [[http://www.bing.com][Bing]] > > It seems that google wins in this instance. :) Indeed :) > My concern here is not with the cleanness of the code but with > usability. For years, org users have been able to use S-left and S-right > when the cursor immediately follows the timestamp. This has felt, to me, > both deliberate and natural -- it has become a fundamental part of the > way I use org-mode. If the underlying code can be made cleaner, that's > fine, so long as the usability remains. I also think the way it has worked so far is natural. > But it is also very likely that I am the only person who changes > timestamps in this way. Are there any others? Yes, me! -- Bastien
