Hi Seb, On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> wrote: > Hi Suvayu, > > suvayu ali wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Sebastien Vauban >> <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> wrote: >>>> Another idea would be to introduce another keyword like APPT an place >>>> these time stamps also into the second line. That might be more easy to >>>> implement. >>> >>> FWIW, my instinctive reaction would be: yes, great! Maybe that clarifies >>> the bits around dates: all active dates get keywords, only inactive ones >>> are without any keyword. >> >> Yes, this would be a nice addition. I always find it difficult to decide how >> to put regular timestamps too. > > By regular timestamps, you mean: inactive timestamps? Can you, maybe, comment > on what makes the decision difficult? >
I meant active timestamps. I'll give you an example of a dilemma. * Timestamp in headline <2011-08-06 Sat> For long headlines, this becomes really ugly. * Timestamp below headline <2011-08-06 Sat> Problem with this is, I can't use fill paragraph otherwise it gets wrapped with the timestamp. The solution is to have a blank line in between. As you see, my reasons are mostly about personal preference and aesthetics. > Sebastien Vauban > Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.
