"Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: >> Another idea would be to introduce another keyword like APPT an place these >> time stamps also into the second line. That might be more easy to implement. > > FWIW, my instinctive reaction would be: yes, great! Maybe that clarifies the > bits around dates: all active dates get keywords, only inactive ones are > without any keyword.
I agree, a special keyword for events would clarify the issue. It would also make this part of the manual easier to understand: http://orgmode.org/org.html#Deadlines-and-scheduling > In that case, I'd opt for EVENT or some such in favor of APPT. Just think at > birthdays, or a TV show: qualifying them as APPT is a bit limitative, IMHO. > EVENT seems a more general term. I also like the EVENT keyword. Regards, Jason
