On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Dirk Scharff <dirk.scha...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Hi > > Am 22.07.2011 um 09:34 schrieb Rainer M Krug: > > For tangling: you could put from __future__ imports into the :shebang and > use padline ":padline no", i.e.: > > #+source: the_test > #+begin_src python :var x=3 :tangle test.py :results output :shebang from > __future__ imports :padline no > print x > #+end_src > > which results in > > from __future__ imports > print x > > Keep in mind, that I have NEVER used python (although I should…). > > > While I'd not call that a clean solution to the problem it will keep me > going for now. > Agreed - but it works. Good. > > Thank you very much for pointing that possibility out, I haven't thought > about trying to move the import statement. > > As for python: its a nice language worth trying in my opinion ;) > Sounds like it - I just need time..... Cheers and good luck with your thesis, Rainer > > > With this i could do the table calculation manually by inserting 100-1000 > call statements (in the real use case I need for my masters-thesis) but it > would be really nice if i could use a table cell as argument for > code-blocks. > > A second problem I have at the moment lies with the execution of >> source-blocks in tables. What I'd like to do: >> >> | argument | result | >> | 1 | #ERROR | >> | | | >> #+TBLFM: $2=call_the_test(x=$<) >> >> I guess I'm just doing something wrong here. Executing the #+Tblfm results >> in the error: "reference $< not found in buffer". How do I do the reference >> correctly in this case? >> >> You can test both cases in the attached org-file. >> > > > best regards, > Dirk > -- Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany) Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology Stellenbosch University South Africa Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44 Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98 Fax (F): +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44 Fax (D): +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44 email: rai...@krugs.de Skype: RMkrug
