Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou <at> gmail.com> writes: > Would you mind telling me if the following patch fixes your problem? > If so, I'll apply it to the code base. >
Yes, it seems to work with the test file I mentioned previously in the thread. I'm a bit suprised it took so long until someone fixed the problem though it was a major bug (changing scheduling of items unintentionally), the problem was well analyzed and the solution was simple. Anyway, thanks for the fix. Now I can remove my defadvice workaround from my setup as it apparently is no longer needed.
