Hi, Tassilo At Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:24:33 +0200, Tassilo Horn wrote: > > SAKURAI Masashi <m.saku...@kiwanami.net> writes: > > Hi! > : > > I implemented calfw-org with consultation of the code of > > org-agenda-list. I think it is difficult to make the speed faster with > > a simple way, the re-design of the whole org-agenda-list algorithm > > seems to be needed, because the key function > > org-agenda-get-day-entries requires only one date and the subsequent > > dependent functions also are designed by the API. > > I think it's pretty fast, so I'd vote for keeping the good and simple > design of the org schedule import in contrast to reimplement the wheel > for a slight speedup.
Thanks for your advice. I think the importing speed depends on the size of org files. I would discuss this topic on another thead. > > It is not so difficult to add a customize of the sort criteria. And > > you can try your custom summary format, modifying > > cfw:org-summary-format. In the function, you can get the time value > > from the text property. > > Right. Maybe a good idea was allowing a custom sort function that sorts > the `contents' for one day in `cfw:org-schedule-period-to-calendar'. > There, you still have the 'time text property that you can use for > sorting. I will implement a simple custom sort function. After then, I would like to discuss time management on calfw. Thank you, -- SAKURAI, Masashi (family, given) m.saku...@kiwanami.net
