Hi Achim, Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes:
> Pure fixes should probably be applied on top of maint and then merged > into master (not cherry-picked from master to maint, this would create > duplicate history). On occasion this might produce a merge conflict, > but these instances should be rare. > > That way maint would be a stable, but still regularly bugfixed branch > without having all the excitement of living on master and having old > features pulled from under you while the new features aren't quite there > yet. If any larger bugs crop up, you can always tag a sub-release on > maint and create a package for anyone not using git. Yes, AFAIU that's what is described in README_maintainer. I will try to stick to this process. -- Bastien
