On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Bastien wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Correcting myself, I paste here another try to the problem at >> hand. Indeed, moving an item to a list he doesn't directly belong to >> makes little sense. Thus, the item will be moved at the end of its >> list. > > Nice. Such a move could be bound to M-<up> when the cursor is on the > first item, instead of throwing an error, as it does now. > > What do you think?
This does sound counter-intuitive to me. - Carsten
