Hi Martyn Thank you very much for sharing your work.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 19:06, Martyn Jago <martyn.j...@btinternet.com> wrote: >> But much better, IMO, would be a way to `evaluate' a single Lilypond >> block and get #+RESULTS with a link to a PNG representing just that >> snippet of music. The snippet would then show up in subsequent exports >> as an included graphic without any post-processing, and could also be >> viewed in-buffer with `C-c C-x C-v'. (For my money, this and not >> `tangle all' would be the intuitive use of `C-c C-c' on a block, but I >> understand how your choice makes sense for other uses.) >> >> Yours, >> Christian > > This is very doable since it is the first thing I tried on initial > experimentation. I think I had some difficulty cropping the snippet (png) > in that the result had no padding at all, but I'm guessing that can be > overcome. > Certainly with the use cases you suggest, the defaults would need to > change, and C-c C-c would need to act as you describe, but that wouldn't > be an issue if we can define seperate 'modes' for the different ways of > working (I think for now the 'modes' can be considered mutually exclusive). For me it would be great to have Lilypond snippets that can be evaluated into a linked score image file visible inline the Org buffer, permanently in #+results: or temporarily as an overlay (similar to org-preview-latex-fragment). Michael
