Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes: > Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> writes: > >> On 6/7/11 Jun 7 -3:01 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote: >>> Vinh Nguyen <vinhdi...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> After the recent org-mode to S5 discussion, I stumbled onto >>>> [these](https://gist.github.com/509761) code. It offers a way to >>>> export org files to HTML5 presentations. I think it looks quite nice. >>>> I see it being better than S5 in that no "ui" folder is required. >>>> What do you all think? Is it worthy of being incorporated into >>>> org-mode? >>> >>> Just tried it, and it's pretty cool! Easy to use and nicely looking. >>> >>> Bye, >>> Tassilo >>> >>> >>> >> >> I have tried the version here: >> https://github.com/twada/org-html5presentation.el >> >> and it does not seem to be ready for prime-time. Org-babel features >> don't work, and there seems to be not a clear integration with the >> org-export-preprocessor. See my two issues, one (not satisfactorily) >> closed, one open. >> >> Possibly this should be folded into contrib, so that people could >> cooperate on it more easily than when it lives off in a separate git >> repo, but it shouldn't be enabled for the unwary until it's been >> thoroughly exercised. >> >> Is there a "tries to use all features" org presentation somewhere that >> would serve as a good acid test for an export facility? It would be >> very handy to have that. >> > > This export target seems to re-implement much of the org HTML export > mechanics which is most likely the reason for the incomplete coverage of > Org's large functionality. > > Perhaps it would be possible to change this so that it works more like > org-s5, that is, so that it firsts exports using the existing html > export functionality, and then simply manipulates the resulting html. >
I haven't looked at or tried either org-s5 or the html5 presentations. I would like to note that much of the refactoring of the html exporter is already done and is ready for prime time. I would very much like to see that my code be used for such experimentations. I will only note that the only way Free Software can thrive is by adopting an "embrace and extend" approach. Jambunathan K. > Best -- Eric --
