Hi, The setup you suggest below is not currently supported. I fear implementing such a system could have some odd semantic extensions into other parts of Org-mode code blocks, for example, would it then make sense for the results of a code block to be collected over all code blocks with that name? For example,
#+source: test2 #+begin_src emacs-lisp 1 #+end_src #+source: test2 #+begin_src emacs-lisp 2 #+end_src #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var data=test2 data #+end_src #+results: | 1 | 2 | Maybe, but this is certainly not possible under the current setup. Anyways, back to your use case, maybe it would be equally convenient to simply have a number of sequential code blocks in the Org-mode file all tangle out, as they will be placed in the tangled file in the order they appear in the Org-mode file, so your example below could be changed to... ** tangling example :PROPERTIES: :tangle: test1.clj :exports: none :END: #+begin_src clojure blah #+end_src #+begin_src clojure foo #+end_src #+begin_src clojure bar #+end_src #+begin_src clojure blah #+end_src While not the same as what you suggested this may be sufficient. Best -- Eric Nicholas Patrick <npatric...@gmail.com> writes: > I'm trying to figure out how to minimize the overhead with using babel to > write some segments of code. I find myself writing short segments of a set > of functionality, then writing a collector source block which is referred to > later on in the code... e.g. > > ********************* > #+srcname: test1 > #+begin_src clojure :tangle test1.clj :exports none :noweb yes > blah > <<test2>> > blah > #+end_src > > #+srcname: test2 > #+begin_src clojure > foo > #+end_src > > #+srcname: test2 > #+begin_src clojure > bar > #+end_src > ********************* > I'd like to see > blah > foo > bar > blah > > but I see > blah > foo > blah > > What I'd like to see is a single srcname for the code that just concatenates > the two different sections when it is referred by <<descriptive-name>>. > That way I don't have to come up with different names and collectors and so > on and so forth. Maybe I'm just not doing "literate programming" right, but > when I'm hacking stuff together, I'd like to minimize the housekeeping. > e.g. > > Is there a way to do this?
