Erik Iverson <er...@ccbr.umn.edu> wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 02:16 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> > [following up on my post...]
> >
> > One thing that should have helped is to set the mathml option to nil:
> >
> > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> > #+MATHJAX: align:"left" mathml:nil
> > path:"/home/nick/lib/mathjax/mathjax-MathJax-20e0cf6/MathJax.js"
> > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> >
> > That forces HTML-CSS output and from what I can see on the mathjax site,
> > that should improve things - but it doesn't for me, so I'm still not out
> > of the woods. Maybe MathJax doesn't know where to get the TeX fonts?
>
> Do the examples on mathjax.org look nice to you? And which browser
> do you happen to be using for viewing?
>
>
Yes - the Cauchy integral formula (as well as the Gauss divergence
theorem further down) on
http://www.mathjax.org/demos/mathml-samples/
looks fine when HTML-CSS rendering is chosen. When MathML
rendering is chosen, the integral sign is too small. That's
what motivated the mathml:nil effort above, but it didn't pan
out. But even in MathML rendering, the integral sign, even though
small, looks better than the one I posted.
I'm using firefox 3.6.14 on Ubuntu 10.10.
Thanks,
Nick
