On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:53:44 -0500 "Andrew J. Korty" <a...@iu.edu> wrote:
> Alan L Tyree <alanty...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm purely a user, but I would not be in favour of splitting the > > list. I find it interesting to have an insight into what the > > developers are doing, where org is headed. Use of a DEV tag would > > be good. > > I don't understand. If you like to read the development posts, why > not subscribe to both lists? My concerns with a DEV tag are twofold: > people would forget to add it, and it clutters the subject line. The development list wouldn't be very interesting without the intense interaction that it now has with users. The org list seems unique in this, at least for the lists that I have sometimes monitored. I take your point about the tags, however. No happy answer to any of this. Cheers, Alan > > Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The thing that is most difficult for me is the fact that I almost > > never can read the entire subject header. Often I get to read only > > the first word. Tags will make that worse. > > It was suggested once that we shorten the [Orgmode] tag to [Org]. > That seems like a change everyone can agree with. Could one of the > mailing list admins please make that change? > > Thanks, > ajk > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > -- Alan L Tyree http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan Tel: 04 2748 6206 _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
