Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes: > "Eric Schulte" <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes: > > [...] > >> >> I also vote for removing the dot and ditaa block types from >> org-exp-blocks, left over from before the existence of begin_src blocks. >> As the original developer of org-exp-blocks, I no longer maintain it in >> favor of focusing on begin_src blocks. >> >> The only downside to removing these block types is breaking existing >> Org-mode files... Perhaps we could add a deprecation warning which will >> appear as a message every time a begin_dot or begin_ditaa blocks is >> evaluate, then after a month or so of warning we can remove those blocks >> entirely. >> >> Thoughts? -- Eric > > Completely in favour ... > > ... so long as the message either provides a clear description of how to > change from =begin_X= to =begin-src X= or gives a link to this clear > description in the manual, say. I haven't changed the various begin_X > blocks yet because of the uncertainty in the mapping from one to the > other... and because I've been lazy, I guess ;-)
Alright, I've just pushed up such deprecation warnings. They instruct the user to switch e.g., begin_dot to begin_src dot. Hopefully this is sufficient. I suppose the responsible thing to do now is to wait through an entire release cycle, and then two releases from now the functions can be removed. Cheers -- Eric _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
