On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Bastien <bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr> wrote: > Puneeth Chaganti <puncha...@gmail.com> writes: > >>>> I don't really understand what is going on here, but there was one @ >>>> still appearing after this patch was applied. I am sending a patch to >>>> remove the one remaining @ symbol in the `org-html-handle-time-stamps` >>>> function. I don't know if this breaks something else and why this was >>>> left out by Jason. >>> >>> Better to test your own patch then ;) I did so, looks fine, I applied >>> it. Thanks! >> >> :) I did test my patch and it worked. > > Ah okay, sorry for assuming otherwise! > >> But these @ seemed to have been put there for some reason, I wasn't >> able to understand, in the quick look that I had. Anyway, thanks. > > It took me a while to understand this as well: when looking at > org-export-as-html, you see some occurrences of "@<tag>". These > org-specific @tags are escaped and will be taken care of in the > rest of the function. > > But org-html-handle-time-stamps happens after these @tags have > been taken care of, which means that no @ is necessary in this > function. > > Hope this helps :)
Thanks for explaining this. :) -- Puneeth _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
