Bastien <bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr> writes: > Hi Štěpán, > > Štěpán Němec <step...@gmail.com> writes: > >> FWIW, I do. Having [Org] (or anything, really) prepended to the subjects >> of _all_ mails coming from a list that is already uniquely identifiable >> (e.g. by its address) has no information value altogether (unlike >> [Babel], [PATCH] etc.) and only takes up the much precious Subject: >> header space. > > Not that reducing the label from [Orgmode] to [Org] already seem to be a > progress in the right direction :) > > Would you object having [Org] instead of [Orgmode]?
Well, I wrote "anything", so, yeah ;-) But I actually usually read the list through Gmane, so I'm mostly unaffected (and Gnus can also strip the list identifier automatically). I still find any kind of such server-side mangling Evil (see also Robert Pluim's reply, most of which I could just sign myself), but from Nick Dokos' reply I see that for people putting all incoming mail into one single place and not able or willing to do anything more than that it can have its uses, so, each to their own I guess... Thank you for consideration, Štěpán _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
