Bastien <bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr> writes: > Hi Torsten, > > Torsten Wagner <torsten.wag...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Using [Orgmode] as a tag on the orgmode list is an arguable point. >> Maybe the someone higher in the queue like to make a decision to >> shorten it to [Org]. > > I agreed this would be an improvement to use [Org]. > > If nobody have a strong objection, I'll make this change in two days.
FWIW, I do. Having [Org] (or anything, really) prepended to the subjects of _all_ mails coming from a list that is already uniquely identifiable (e.g. by its address) has no information value altogether (unlike [Babel], [PATCH] etc.) and only takes up the much precious Subject: header space. I have never understood why anyone would like anything like that. If you want to somehow treat the mails from this list specially, why don't you filter on the presence of the mailing list address in the headers, for example? Štěpán _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
