Hi Eric, "Eric Schulte" wrote: > Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: >> Isn't such a prefix already available through the "shebang" option: can't it >> be multiline? Anyway, I don't think it's the problem here... > > The :shebang header argument is only used for tangling, not during > evaluation, however if you ever needed to tangle python code blocks with > non-ASCII encodings this would be the appropriate solution.
Sorry, reading this after the other post... But, does it still make sense to make that distinction: - some sort of preamble only for tangling? - a preamble for evaluation (and tangling)? Why would the shebang not be inserted as well for evaluation? Do you/we need: - one only for eval, - one only for tangling, - and one for both? Depending on that answer, I would maybe make it more explicit what's the role of each, like: - :eval-preamble - :tangle-preambel - :preamble But I'm wondering if one sort of preamble wouldn't be enough (and be used both for tangling and evaluating)? Best regards, Seb -- Sébastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
