Hi Seb, Nice idea, I've just pushed up a patch which improves this message.
Best -- Eric Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: > Hi Eric and Dan, > > I was puzzled this morning by a message "evalution aborted" without any extra > info. "Aborted" made me think there was an error, so I toggle debug-on-error, > but it did not give me any more insight on the problem. > > After searching for the message in the code base, I found it in =ob.el= and > understood it was when eval was disabled (set to =no= or =never=). > > In this case, I would ask for a clearer message: > > diff --git a/lisp/ob.el b/lisp/ob.el > index 584d627..5bb0d5c 100644 > --- a/lisp/ob.el > +++ b/lisp/ob.el > @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ of potentially harmful code." > (not (yes-or-no-p > (format "Evaluate this%scode on your system? " > (if info (format " %s " (nth 0 info)) " ")))))) > - (prog1 nil (message "evaluation aborted")) > + (prog1 nil (message "Evaluation disabled by user (option).")) > t))) > > ;;;###autoload > > Feel free to change it to something better, but, in any case, I'd prefer > "disabled" over "aborted". At least in my mind, "disabled" is not related to > "error", while "aborted" is (in my mind, or in my Frenglish). > > Best regards, > Seb _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
