"Eric Schulte" <[email protected]> writes:
> alright, thanks for sticking with this. You are definitely now using
> the latest code. I believe the newest version of the ob-calc-eval
> function should work -- at the very least it should give a nicer error
> message. Could you please require update again and let me know how it
> goes?
(for the list's benefit: Eric and I have had a few out-of-the-list
exchanges but as everything now seems to be working fine, I thought I'd
reconnect the thread to the list...)
Eric,
just to confirm that it all seems to work just fine from a cold boot of
emacs without any extra (require 'ob-eval). My babel configuration has
the following:
#+begin_src emacs_lisp
(org-babel-do-load-languages
'org-babel-load-languages
'((R . t)
(calc . t)
(ditaa . t)
...
#+end_src
and that's about it really. Evaluating the calc examples you sent
initially all work perfectly.
Using src_calc{5-2}, for instance, also works just fine for export.
I now wonder if it would be worthwhile discussing the choices you have
made regarding stack versus algebraic evaluation. I would rather have
the quote mean an algebraic expression, just from the simple reason that
these will be longer than stack operations and so the overhead of a
quote is smaller as a percentage of keystrokes...
Anyway, thanks for this. I think this is going to be quite useful but
it does mean really getting down and learning emacs calc...
--
Eric S Fraga
GnuPG: 8F5C 279D 3907 E14A 5C29 570D C891 93D8 FFFC F67D
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
