Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Oct 29, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> Due to changes made to lists, it is no longer possible to have a sublist, >>> some text and then another sublist while still in the same top- level list >>> item, like in the following situation: >>> >>> - Some list >>> + A first sublist >>> + of two elements >>> >>> A text belonging to the top-level list >>> >>> + Then another sublist >>> + and a second element in it >>> - End of main list >> >> Basically, it means that this entry for this entry (about Org Babel) from >> an old file of mine (update this morning) does not publish anymore the same >> way: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> * How to view the results >> >> - =C-c C-v C-v= (or =C-c C-v v=) -- View the expanded body of a code block. >> >> - =C-c C-v C-z= -- Switch to the *session* of the current code block (first, >> you need to add =:session= to it). >> >> Use =C-u C-c C-v C-z= to bring up the session with the input variable >> pre-loaded. >> >> =C-c C-v z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session-with-code=) is a variant of =C-c >> C-v C-z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session=): instead of switching to the >> session buffer, it splits the window between: >> >> + the session buffer, and >> + a language major-mode edit buffer for the code block in question. >> >> This can be convenient for using language major mode for interacting with >> the session buffer. >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> The last sentence is *not* considered part of the second element of the >> first list. >> >> Although I've seen similar constructs in many, many documents, does anyone >> know enough rules of style to tell me if this is a wrong way to write >> things down? Or, does some possibility still exist to support this >> seamlessly? > > It is not that this would be bad style. In fact I do miss this kind of > structure as well, and accepting loosing it was the biggest argument against > Nicolas' change.
Does that mean that we must admit this will stay like that forever, or will one try to look and see if it's possible to make that extension? > However, the trade was for much greater stability and consistency of plain > lists, Nicolas has done some great work here. Another issue was that the > LaTeX exporter never had any support for these structures, so that was > inconsistent for a long time. I know that Bastien told he would fix it when he would have time. So, that did not seem to be an impossible wish. Best regards, Seb -- Sébastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
