Nick and others,

>    o Although your post was the trigger, the rant was not meant for you
>      personally: it was meant for the whole list. It is often the case
>      that people describe a problem with very little detail and it
>      takes a series of back-and-forths before we can really understand
>      what the problem is. Sometimes that's inevitable but many times
>      it can be avoided. My suggestion was to include enough detail
>      in the original report so the back-and-forth can be avoided to
>      the extent possible.

Reading the list for a short while before posting, it became fairly
obvious to me what was expected in order to receive help. But, since
posting a rant to the mail list only informs people who read the list
of your displeasure, and given that the group most likely to benefit
from your advice are new list members, it might behoove us to post a
clear(er) list of expectations on the org-mode site when we introduce
potential users to the list.

Best wishes,
Jeff

-- 
Jeffrey Horn
Graduate Lecturer and PhD Student in Economics
George Mason University

(704) 271-4797
jh...@gmu.edu
jrhorn...@gmail.com

http://www.failuretorefrain.com/jeff/

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Reply via email to