At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:21:05 +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > After giving this some thought, I don't this this can be done in a > clear and non-confusing way.
Thanks for spending so much time/energy considering it, despite the fact that it would be incoherent with the rest of your interface! > I do think it is necessary to somehow change the date relative to > what the previously set date is. The only way to make this half way > transparently is to show that date in the prompt as the default > date. Okay. > There was lots of good advice to so what you want in different ways, > including not rescheduling, or using bulk actions in the agenda. You know, I have `f' and `b' bound to org-agenda-date-later/-earlier, and that would be perfectly adequate for me, *if* I got appropriate visual feedback. The problem is the red "S2" or "S3" I'm looking at doesn't change on the fly when I reschedule. And it's hard to train myself not to hit `f' twice when I see S2 :-) > Finally, if you still want a fast command doing this: > > (defun org-agenda-reschedule-to-today () > (interactive) > (flet ((org-read-date (&rest rest) (current-time))) > (call-interactively 'org-agenda-schedule))) That's a good idea. I don't think I need etags in my agenda buffer, so `M-.' works. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
