Hello, I'm still into lists, and I'm wondering about the global usefulness of `org-auto-renumber-ordered-lists', provided that:
- it isn't noticeably slower to renumber and fix a list than to simply fix its indentation; - you can use [...@start:num] to enforce a special numbering; - some actions on a list will renumber it whatever the value of this variable is. So, I'd like to hear about other users. Do you set this variable to nil? If so, what is your use case? If there's a need for decreasing numbers or numbers increasing by more than one, I could add [...@step:num] and [...@start:num,@step:num] as possibilities, but it looks a bit overkill to me. Anyway, the idea behind this would be to: - remove `org-maybe-renumber-ordered-list', - remove `org-maybe-renumber-ordered-list-safe', - remove this variable, - rename `org-fix-bullet-type' to `org-fix-bullet', - call `org-fix-bullet' unconditionally when acting on a list instead of having to decide if the function should renumber or simply fix indentation. What do you think about it? Regards, -- Nicolas _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
