Hi Nick, Nick Dokos wrote: > Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> :-) Actually, in this specific area I had been thinking to removing or at >> least deprecating shell and elisp links, because the Org-babel way is much >> better and clearer to have that code in a block, rather than hiding it in >> the invisible part of of a link. > > Here is an early vote [1] for *not* removing shell and elisp links. > Deprecation/documentation/scary warnings is fine with me, but I do use these > kinds of links and I'd like to be able to continue using them.
For my own understanding of what more I could do that I don't even think of right now, *if not indiscreet/private*, could you give a couple of applications of such links? Best regards, Seb -- Sébastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
