Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > :-) Actually, in this specific area I had been thinking to > removing or at least deprecating shell and elisp links, > because the Org-babel way is much better and clearer to have > that code in a block, rather than hiding it in the invisible > part of of a link. >
Here is an early vote [1] for *not* removing shell and elisp links. Deprecation/documentation/scary warnings is fine with me, but I do use these kinds of links and I'd like to be able to continue using them. Thanks, Nick [1] and if necessary, I can vote often too :-), but I don't know if the vote early/vote often model would work here... _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
