Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I do not think this is the right fix. You are only allowing lines
> like :
>
> ---
> # a line of text
> ---
>
> to be treated as comments, when they are not! The first regex is the
> one matching comments definition (# on column 0 and '#+ ' everywhere).
> Handling of lines like #+ATTR_LaTeX should be processed outside of
> comments handling functions to not add confusion.
>
> Moreover, I mailed a fix earlier (see thread with Sebastian Rose:
> unwanted #+attr_backend and #+backend stuff) which already solves that
> problem, among others.
>
Yes, this patch has been floundering on the patchwork server for a while
now. I've been reticent to apply it hoping that someone with more
familiarity with the export engine would take care of it. At this point
however I think delaying it's application is doing more hard than good.
I'd like to apply this, however one last question. This patch doesn't
address Sébastien's table issue, namely
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
** table comment issue
#+BEGIN_changemargin {-4.2cm}{0cm}
#+TBLNAME: AutresFPNVE
#+ATTR_LaTeX: align=lrrrrr
| | | Montant total (\EUR) | Taux
amort (\%) | Part pro. (\%) | Déduc (\%) | NVE (\EUR) |
|---+------------------------------------------+----------------------+-----------------+----------------+------------+------------|
| | Documentation et formation | 51.05 |
| | | 0.00 |
| | Communications GSM | 831.16 |
100 | 25 | 100 | 207.79 |
| | Internet (Dommel) | 167.88 |
100 | 33 | 100 | 55.40 |
| | Fournitures à amortir (ordinateur + GSM) | 762.51 |
33 | 80 | 100 | 201.30 |
| | Restaurant | 304.70 |
100 | 100 | 69 | 210.24 |
|---+------------------------------------------+----------------------+-----------------+----------------+------------+------------|
| | Total | |
| | | 1062.02 |
| ^ | | |
| | | Total |
#+TBLFM:
$7=$3*$4*$5*$6/1000000;%.2f::@2$3=51.05::@3$3=9.00+184.88+51.22+201.82+45.67+69.03+62.93+54.16+38.87+39.77+36.35+37.46::@4$3=12*13.99::@6$3=146.50+158.20;%.2f::@7$7=vsum(@-...@-ii);%.2f
#+END_changemargin
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Before I apply, should the patch be updated to handle this case? Let me
know and I'll either apply the current version of the patch, or an
updated version.
Thanks for your patience -- Eric
>
> Regards,
>
> -- Nicolas
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
