i.e. this:
diff --git a/lisp/org-agenda.el b/lisp/org-agenda.el
index 93334b6..4bbaefc 100644
--- a/lisp/org-agenda.el
+++ b/lisp/org-agenda.el
@@ -2764,6 +2764,7 @@ bind it in the options section.")
(org-set-local 'org-agenda-name name)))
(setq buffer-read-only nil))
+(eval-when-compile (defvar org-agenda-overriding-columns-format))
(defun org-finalize-agenda ()
"Finishing touch for the agenda buffer, called just before displaying it."
(unless org-agenda-multi
@@ -6129,10 +6130,7 @@ and by additional input from the age of a
schedules or deadline entry."
(push-mark)
(goto-char pos)
(when (org-mode-p)
- (org-show-context 'agenda)
- (save-excursion
- (and (outline-next-heading)
- (org-flag-heading nil)))) ; show the next heading
+ (org-show-context 'agenda))
(recenter (/ (window-height) 2))
(run-hooks 'org-agenda-after-show-hook)
(and highlight (org-highlight (point-at-bol) (point-at-eol)))))
@@ -6315,10 +6313,7 @@ at the text of the entry itself."
(widen)
(goto-char pos)
(when (org-mode-p)
- (org-show-context 'agenda)
- (save-excursion
- (and (outline-next-heading)
- (org-flag-heading nil))))))) ; show the next heading
+ (org-show-context 'agenda)))))
(defun org-agenda-goto-mouse (ev)
"Go to the Org-mode file which contains the item at the mouse click."
On 2010-05-22, Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
>
> Could it be the following in org-agenda-switch-to?
>
> (save-excursion
> (and (outline-next-heading)
> (org-flag-heading nil))))))) ; show the next heading
>
> I wonder if it will cause any problems to remove that whole sexp.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Samuel
>
> On 2010-05-19, Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Samuel,
>>
>> thanks for your feedback - I do not know what else could be wrong
>> here.....
>>
>> - Carsten
>>
>> On May 18, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Carsten,
>>>
>>> On 2010-05-14, Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> for some reason I do not remember, I enforce showing the next
>>>> headline
>>>> in this special case. Please try the following patch and run with if
>>>> for a while, to see if it causes any problems.
>>>
>>> The patch did not apply for some reason, but I manually applied it,
>>> and it seemed in trivial testing to work perfectly. Strangely,
>>> however, today the behavior is as if I did not apply the patch. I did
>>> eval the function, so it must be some other piece of code that is
>>> involved. I don't get it. (Not physically able to investigate now,
>>> unfortunately.)
>>>
>>> Samuel
>>>
>>> --
>>> Q: How many CDC "scientists" does it take to change a lightbulb?
>>> A: "You only think it's dark." [CDC has denied a deadly disease for
>>> 25 years]
>>> ==========
>>> Retrovirus: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html
>>
>> - Carsten
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Q: How many CDC "scientists" does it take to change a lightbulb?
> A: "You only think it's dark." [CDC has denied a deadly disease for 25
> years]
> ==========
> Retrovirus: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html
>
--
Q: How many CDC "scientists" does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: "You only think it's dark." [CDC has denied a deadly disease for 25 years]
==========
Retrovirus: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
