On May 19, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
Bastien <bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr> writes:
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes:
Is there anyone who would be willing to step up as a co-
maintainer, at
least for some time?
I'd be glad to help, but I'm short of time for the moment and I
prefer
to concentrate on maintaining the server and Worg.
I'm afraid I can't devote significantly more time. (In any case, I do
not know the agenda and task/time management side of org well enough.)
But I would be happy to help out in a, err, coalition. Would it be
possible for us to develop a slightly more formalised triage/bug
tracking system whereby any list member who feels able to can say
"I'll
look into this and report back with a recommendation for
action". Perhaps this would work via a jointly maintained todo list on
Worg or elsewhere? Any thoughts? Or is this optimistic and do we
really
need one person to step up?
I think an issue-tracking system would be great. And if there are
other people besides John who want to take up individual issues, I am
sure this would be good.
I will be happy with anything you propose in this direction. Also I
know that John is (I think) tracking ledger issues in org-mode - maybe
we can use his setup in a file that is part of the git repo?
If we have reports continue to come in on the mailing list, then a bug
tracker could use the message number on gmane as a reference number.
So the discussions could stay on the list, but negotiation and
assignment would happen in the tracker.
But - I have no experience with bug trackers, so anything anyone will
put forward would be an improvement.
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
