On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:04:16 -0400, Dan Davison wrote: > Right, when being friendly to new users is the purpose of customize. > A further argument that "Font Lock" is a misnomer is that "Org Odd > Levels Only" is not related to font lock. It could be put in Structure, > but I think the decision to put it in the same group as all the other > variables related to appearance made sense.
> And I think there may be other examples of things that are more > helpfully described as "Appearance" than "Font Lock". For example, some > of the options in the "Org Startup" group might benefit from also having > an entry in an appearance group, e.g. org-hide-block-startup. Or perhaps > we could have an option to control whether links to images are replaced > in the buffer by the image? (a topic for a different thread...) Hi Dan, I previously thought it might confuse new users if we use different term specifically for org-mode. But now I completely agree with you. "Appearance" is indeed a much better word for this customize group. -- J c/* __o/* X <\ * (__ Y */\ < _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
