Hi Lukasz,
thanks for the patch.
I am wondering: What would be a good use case for the `far' setting?
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Feb 10, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes:
On Feb 9, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Matt Lundin wrote:
Interesting. The docstring for org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines
seems to
suggest otherwise. Is this documentation inaccurate?
,----
| Documentation:
| Non-nil means don't show near deadline entries in the global todo
list.
| Near means closer than `org-deadline-warning-days' days.
| The idea behind this is that such items will appear in the agenda
anyway.
| See also `org-agenda-todo-ignore-with-date'.
| See also the variable `org-agenda-tags-todo-honor-ignore-options'.
`----
This ist just to explain what "near" means in the sentence before.
I have improved the docstring, thanks.
And I've made it work with 'near and 'far symbols.
Now org-agenda-todo-ignore-with-date can be set to:
nil - to show (not ignore) notes with deadline timestamps
'far - to ignore notes which are further than the warning period
'near - to hide deadlines that are really close, good for an
ostrich ;-)
non-nil - do not show *any* notes with deadline timestamps on a todo
list
Check it out
http://github.com/steelman/steelman-org-mode/tree/org-agenda-todo-ignore-close-deadlines
http://github.com/steelman/steelman-org-mode.git
--
Miłego dnia,
Łukasz Stelmach
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
