On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Richard Moreland <r...@ncogni.to> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > They are not required, but they eliminate potential problems that may > be encountered with the simple path-based node identification scheme. > The risk level is fairly low, and you should be fine with the force > option disabled. > > The path-based id scheme fails if you have this: > > * Parent > ** A name > *** A node you didn't edit > ** A name > *** A node you edited > > The path to the node you edited is ambiguous and will cause a sync > conflict. As long as you keep this in mind, you should be fine.
So as long as I don't duplicate names in the same level, I should be okay? I don't see myself ever doing that anyway, so that seems harmless enough. Aside — there's no way to cycle the visibility of drawers to *completely* hidden, is there? I wouldn't mind the property drawers as much if I could completely ignore their existence during routine org-mode editing. :-) _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
