Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Nov 26, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Dan wrote: >> Also, I do agree with others that to the extent possible we want >> presentations to emerge naturally out of 'normal' org-files with the help >> of established org mechanisms such as selective subtree export. E.g. using >> the heading title to set the column width feels wrong; the natural reaction >> is to think that that sort of metadata should be in a property. > > OK, I hear you all pull the same string, that Org-mode files should be > beamer presentations as they are, more or less. > > Here are some ideas in that direction: > > 1. Don't automatically use a specific headline level to create the columns > environment - at least make that configurable. > > 2. Make beamer export force org-export-headline-levels equal > org-beamer-frame-level, so that headlines below the frame level > automatically become itemize levels, unless modified by tags or > properties. > > 3. Use meta data to make headlines special, instead of mixing this stuff > into the. I first thought this is too hard - but maybe it is OK when > edited with column view? Hmm, I am only half-sold on this - properties > are so hard to see when you need them frequently during editing. > > Thomas asked for the possibility to export a subtree as a presentation, with > *relative* levels determining functionality. This should be easy - when > selection a subtree with `C-c @' and then exporting, relative levels are > already being used now, for any kind of export.
As far as I understand, I perfectly agree with the explained approach, yes! Thanks for all, Seb -- Sébastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
