John Wiegley <jwieg...@gmail.com> writes: > On Oct 16, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Gregory J. Grubbs wrote: > >> One suggestion: I think when your code stops on a clock and prompts to >> keep/subtract/cancel, it should expand the drawer (for those of us who >> use drawers). > > I've added this to the version of the patch below. > > As another question: > > When attempting to clock into A, and org-resolve-clocks finds a > dangling clock in B, and the user presses "k" or "s" (i.e., not K or > S), do you expect it to clock you into A or into B when the resolution > is done? Right now K will continue the clock-in to A, but k will > abort the clock-in to A and clock you into B to resume that task.
Since my intention was to clock in to A, I would find it confusing in any event to suddenly find myself clocked into B. Even in the case of a dangling clock caused by an emacs crash, I would prefer to stay in control! Should task B strike me as the task I would rather be clocking in instead of task A, I would expect to either hit C-g and clock into B, or go through the list of all dangling clocks and come back to B. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
