Kyle Meyer <[email protected]> writes: > Tara Lorenz writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> it seems that the documentation and code for `org-latex-pdf-process' are >> out of sync: Where the documentation mentions "%bib" the code expects >> "%bibtex". At least, that's how i understand it. > > Thanks for catching that. It seems [1] it's an old regression from > f6187deca (ox-latex: Small refactor, 2015-09-13). > > [1] https://orgmode.org/list/[email protected]/ > >> I resolved that confusing situation by making "%bib" and "%bibtex" >> equally accepted, without touching the documentation. Thus, old >> configurations work again ("%bib") as well as workarounds (using >> "%bibtex") which might have gotten employed somewhere. > > That sounds like a good approach to me. Applied (13e98e2a1), adding a > TINYCHANGE cookie and a reference to the above commit in the message. > >> Subject: [PATCH] ox-latex.el: fix interpretation of org-latex-pdf-process > [...] >> (process (if (functionp org-latex-pdf-process) org-latex-pdf-process >> - ;; Replace "%latex" and "%bibtex" with, >> + ;; Replace "%latex", "%bib" and "%bibtex" with, >> ;; respectively, "%L" and "%B" so as to adhere to >> ;; `format-spec' specifications. > > I also tweaked this comment a bit because, with the above change, the > elements before and after "respectively" no longer lined up.
Applied, as commit 13e98e2a1 This message is being sent to update our issue tracker at https://tracker.orgmode.org
