pillule <[email protected]> writes: >Kyle Meyer <[email protected]> writes: > >> Thanks for the patch. >> >> pillule writes: >> >>> Hi, it is asked to the user if we want to revert changes when re-entering in >>> a org-source buffer. >>> Even if the buffer have no modifications. >> >> Hmm, that description seems to be focusing on the prompt's parenthetical >> note. When org-src-ask-before-returning-to-edit-buffer is non-nil and >> there's an existing source buffer, the caller is asked whether to return >> to it or regenerate/overwrite it. The message warns that the second >> option (i.e. answering "no, don't return to existing buffer") will >> discard changes. >> >> It looks like this patch assumes that, when the buffer is unmodified, >> the answer to the above question necessarily becomes "yes, return to the >> existing buffer", but it's not clear to me why that should be. With an >> unmodified buffer, I suppose there's less of a difference between the >> two answers, but at least with the default org-src-window-setup value, >> there's still a user-visible difference in terms of window organization. > >You are right I clearly missed org-src-ask-before-returning-to-edit-buffer >Don't know how . . . > >Sorry for the noise.
Canceled, by reporter. This message is being sent to update our issue tracker at https://tracker.orgmode.org
