OK, whatever... Maybe it's that I've programmed embedded systems for quite a lot of time and got used to analyse scenarios and produce safe code without unnecessary function calls in obvious scenarios.
But let's not discuss about the sex of the angels. Your call.. /PA On Fri, 10 Jul 2026 at 19:55, Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > "Pedro A. Aranda" <[email protected]> writes: > > > I just base my argument in the fact that I have not found any key for > > any of the options for either beamer or ltx-talk that would need quoting. > > You are right, but, for example, I did not anticipate at all that we > will even need something non-beamer to be added to ox-beamer. > So, I prefer to avoid relying on such "obvious" assumptions, and instead > have safe code style. > > Also, it is not uncommon when people look at the existing code and > either copy-paste it (I'm sure you did you yourself several times in > patches) or learn from those examples and produce similar code styles > elsewhere. Even if not quoting a variable in regexp is nearly-100% safe > in this particular scenario, I'd prefer to avoid introducing unsafe > practices. > > Finally, I am genuinely surprised about your reaction to this particular > detail. I can see how the code can be somewhat less readable (more > nesting), but isn't it marginal? In my eyes, consistent safe code style > is far more important, especially when weighted against one extra set of > parenthesis. > > -- > Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, > Org mode maintainer, > Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. > Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, > or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92> > -- Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden, Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden Georg Kreisler "Sagen's Paradeiser" (ORF: Als Radiohören gefährlich war) => write BE! Year 2 of the New Koprocracy This was produced by a human (implied virtues and weaknesses acknowledged) I'd hate this being fed to any form of AS (sorry AI)...
