On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 09:14:46PM -0600, Laurence von Bottorff wrote: > So "my" improvements to ob-sml are causing a problem -- is what this sounds > like, right? If I had simply said, "Hey guys, me and a friend have done a > new version ob-sml..." there would have been no problem?
That would have been clever, yes. You also could "steal" some stuff from some Proprietary Company (TM) and offer it here with "hey, a bro and me have come up with this". It works until it doesn't. In the end you do a huge disservice to the community. There was a very complete and insightful post five days ago in this list by Ihor Radchenko on why LLM generated patches currently aren't welcome Message-ID: <871pi3iasi.fsf@localhost> List-Archive: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2026-03/msg00032.html If you curate the results of "your" LLM as carefully as you skim this list, I'd be even more wary of taking patches from you. I'm not talking for the maintainers, though. Cheers -- tomás
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
