Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > First reason is simple - I have been instructed by Emacs maintainers to > not accept LLM-written patches. This is because GNU does not yet have an > official policy on this. And GNU does not have a policy because the > licensing implications of LLM code are not yet clear. > So, I currently cannot accept anything that is generated by LLMs. > (We are discussing on some ways forward right now on GNU lists, but > there is no decision on the topic yet) > > The second reason is more important.
I've been seeing and participating in similar discussions in other projects. Igor's comments in my view are 100% right.
