Don't know, but it really feels soft of awkward that your heading can't
start with COMMENT.
I've not used it in Org, but I do in other word processing setups, where
you get a file and
you want to add temporary stuff at the end for inter-author communication
processes.


On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 at 18:11, Max Nikulin <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Andreas Matthias writes:
> >
> >> test.org:
> >> #+include: a.org
> >> #+include: b.org
> >>
> >> a.org:
> >> * COMMENT BBB
>
> I have an idea that might help to create a workaround. Define a derived
> backend that exports headings with some tag, e.g. :fence:, as empty
> string (instead of dropping it early from AST) and add this kind of
> heading between "#+include:" lines:
>
>      #+include: with-comment.org
>      * ---Fence---  :fence:
>      #+include: more.org :minlevel 1
>
> On 06/11/2025 03:14, Ihor Radchenko wrote:> Then, Org looks at
> #+include: b.org, notice that it is inside
> > _commented_ heading, and skips over :)
> >
> > This is a bug.
>
> Definitely, it is a pitfall. Whether it is a bug, from my point of view,
> it is a more subtle question. Limiting scope of "#+include:" may lead to
> complications. Consider some text between include lines
>
>      #+include: with-comment-heading.org
>
>      A paragraph.
>
>      #+include: another-file.org
>
> If second include is not a part of last heading from first file then
> what you are going to do with intermediate text? If it belongs to the
> included heading then it is confusing to the similar degree as the
> reported case with following include. Otherwise it is top level text and
> "#+include:" becomes a way to achieve a frequently requested feature -
> terminating heading without starting new one. Most export backends have
> no way to express that some section is ended and following text should
> belong to higher level section. (I am leaving aside various insets.) I
> am in doubts if something like inline tasks should be allowed for all
> headings, despite it may be really convenient for notes.
>
>

-- 
Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden,
Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
Georg Kreisler

"Sagen's Paradeiser" (ORF: Als Radiohören gefährlich war) => write BE!
Year 1 of the New Koprocracy

Reply via email to