jman via "General discussions about Org-mode." <[email protected]> writes:
> Rudolf Adamkovič <[email protected]> writes: > >> I think we could also improve the wording of the following: >> >> * Refresh Setup Current Buffer -- not grammatical, somewhat unclear >> * Do Children Sequentially -- inappropriate >> * Do Children Parallel -- inappropriate, not grammatical ("in Parallel") >> >> Any ideas? > > Hi, just a drive-by comment. > > By reading your patch: > > ["Do Children Sequentially" org-toggle-ordered-property :style radio > :selected (org-entry-get nil "ORDERED") > :active org-enforce-todo-dependencies :keys "C-c C-x o"] > > ["Do Children Parallel" org-toggle-ordered-property :style radio > :selected (not (org-entry-get nil "ORDERED")) > :active org-enforce-todo-dependencies :keys "C-c C-x o"] > > How would you explain these in plain English? Can the explaination be reduced > to two words? Example: "Sort current entry by ... " A quick read of the associated info page has given me some ideas: [[info:org#TODO dependencies]]. "Do Children" isn't even what's happening. We are enforcing how the children are able to be done. Some ideas: "Enforce sequential completion of subtasks" "Enforce sequential completion of children" "Enforce completion order" "Enforce task completion order" "Enforce TODO completion order" <- My favorite Also I'm not a fan of the word "parallel" here. Since the text should look similar to the sequential version maybe just prefix my previous ideas with "Do not"? > > The other one: > > ["Refresh Setup Current Buffer" org-mode-restart t] > > I would probably just repeat what the documentation says: "Restart org-mode".
