>>>>> Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> writes:
> Juergen Fenn <jf...@gmx.net> writes:
>> Am 03.04.25 um 09:37 Uhr schrieb Ihor Radchenko:
>>>> I don't agree. Users who are apparently happy with LuaLaTeX
>>>> should have no problems with pdflatex and UTF8.
>>> If you know an easy and universal way to support UTF8 is
>>> pdflatex, please do share.
>>
>> I am sorry I could not read all the discussion up to here, but
>> you might like to take a look at this discussion that took place
>> on several TUG mailing lists whe TeX Live 2025 was published over
>> the last weeks as to …️
>> https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2025-March/051258.html
> This email concludes with:
>> Yes luatex is slower but that is a price well paid in my opinion.
> It sounds like it would be good to provide feedback that the
> slowness is a serious problem for preview.
> Regarding effective deprecation of XeLaTex, this seems to be the
> relevant article (found in that thread):
> https://www.texdev.net/2024/11/05/engine-news-from-the-latex-project
Thanks for the information. I use xelatex for org-mode export and was
unaware of the depreciation. I will change back to pdflatex.
Colin Baxter.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
