This could be added to the org-mode documentation as a hint for those who use native fontification. Should I send a patch for that or trivial enough you'd do it, if you agree?
On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 6:54 AM Ship Mints <shipmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > For the record, this is what I've recommended and what I will use: > > (defun my/XXX-mode-hook () > (when (or buffer-file-name > (not (string-prefix-p " " (buffer-name)))) > ;; do something expensive > )) > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 6:36 AM Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> > wrote: > >> Ship Mints <shipmi...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Yes, could do, and nothing needed by org-mode or markdown-mode. Could >> also >> > test for buffer-file-name nil. Or test both. Let's recommend that >> simpler >> > approach and I will rescind my markdown PR in favor of this simpler >> > suggestion. >> >> Well. Org or markdown should name the buffers according to the >> convention :) Org does it though. So, we should be good. >> >> Closing the patch request. >> Canceled. >> >> -- >> Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, >> Org mode maintainer, >> Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. >> Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, >> or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92> >> >
