Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > It is not just about \(...\).
Of course, and I agree that a more general mechanism is needed to solve all precedence problems, be it in tables, or (better) in general. But, as I said before, even if we had such a mechanism, it should not be necessary to use it for \(...\) in tables, as there is no ambiguity, and so no "madness", no? Does that make sense? Or, am I mistaken? Rudy -- "It is far better to have a question that can't be answered than an answer that can't be questioned." --- Carl Sagan Rudolf Adamkovič <rud...@adamkovic.org> [he/him] http://adamkovic.org
