Karthik Chikmagalur <karthikchikmaga...@gmail.com> writes: >>>> ... >>>> Considering this, it might be better to just split >>>> `org-link-preview-file' into two public functions, where the "inside" >>>> function accepts an image instead of a file. >>> >>> Agree. >>> Would you be interested to create a patch? >> >> Did you think of something like this? > > It looks like you are respecting the alignment specifications, set via > org-image-align or the :align property of #+attr_*, but not the :width > property. Is the idea that the preview implementation that provides the > image should independently use org-display-inline-image--width?
The width is set before the inline image is created. I'm not sure how this should be handled. Is the with set when creating the inline image Ihor? If the width is set before the image is created how should it be handled in the preview image-data function? > At minimum this requires making org-display-inline-image--width a public > function. But it would be good for org-link-preview-image-data to > respect both properties. I agree with both but I'm not sure what should be done on this.
