>>> ... >>> Considering this, it might be better to just split >>> `org-link-preview-file' into two public functions, where the "inside" >>> function accepts an image instead of a file. >> >> Agree. >> Would you be interested to create a patch? > > Did you think of something like this?
It looks like you are respecting the alignment specifications, set via org-image-align or the :align property of #+attr_*, but not the :width property. Is the idea that the preview implementation that provides the image should independently use org-display-inline-image--width? At minimum this requires making org-display-inline-image--width a public function. But it would be good for org-link-preview-image-data to respect both properties. Karthik
