> Regarding the normalization with interactive, if you are not using > transient infixes and instead lean on the :info class and dynamic > :descriptions, you can display state and store it using normal buffer-local > and defvar techniques, providing visual feedback for what might be hidden > states after the user gets more familiar. The commands work with or > without a prefix currently active. In this usage model, you only use > Transient for its flow control, display, and layout. I find the infix > system to be somewhat of a distraction if you are not actually building a > CLI wrapper, but you can definitely make suffixes and descriptions "smart" > by reading a scope from the prefix and making custom infixes that also > obtain more state when displayed. A custom infix for storing org elements > or objects could certainly be a thing.
Do you have an example of using buffer-local variables to store transient state? Directing me to an appropriate section of the showcase should be plenty. Karthik
