Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> writes: > I have realized that ob-doc-gnuplot.org and org-babel-gnuplot.org files are > quite similar.
Good catch! The latter have not got some recent update though. I think, the > former may use noweb to have source code blocks active while using the same > content for exporting with header arguments. > Are there any other reason why duplicated content exists? I would drop > one file to avoid divergence. Looking briefly into it, it's not clear to me that the inclusion of org-babel-gnuplot.org in commit 394a6326881fc1f077ca8f4b891d8f133f80d305 wasn't an accident. It might make sense to include an examples/plotting.org at some point, with very different content. But as things stand today I believe of the two files ob-doc-gnuplot.org is the one that should be retained and if there's any meaningful information contained in org-babel-gnuplot.org which isn't yet in ob-doc-gnuplot.org that it should be assimilated into ob-doc-gnuplot.org. PS: please include my address in replies. -- Suhail
